The Transformation of Trade: From Goods to Bads

international trade agreements

In the realm of international trade, there is a general consensus among economists that it brings about numerous benefits to the global economy. However, it is crucial to ensure that trade is fair and just. While the majority of traded items are considered goods, there exists a category of goods that can more appropriately be deemed as ‘bads.’ Over time, the perception of certain goods has changed, leading to their classification as detrimental to society. An example of this transformation is evident in the historical trade of narcotics. In the past, the United Kingdom fought a war with China to secure the right to trade in narcotics, but today, the international community actively intercepts and restricts the shipment of such substances. Similarly, the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control signifies the shift of tobacco from being viewed as a good to being recognized as a bad. This article explores the complexities of international trade and the need for restrictions on certain goods, ultimately aiming to promote better health for all.

The Benefits and Controversies of International Trade

Economists widely agree that international trade is a positive force for economic growth. Throughout history, the prosperity of great trading nations, such as Venice and the British Empire, can be attributed to their engagement in global trade. In the modern era, the United States has dominated global trade with its widespread export of products, a phenomenon often referred to as “Coca-colonization.” However, the balance of power is shifting as China rises as a new global trade powerhouse, flooding markets worldwide and securing control over scarce natural resources, particularly in Africa. On the other hand, countries that isolate themselves from the global market, like the Soviet Union, have experienced failure by protecting their industries from international competition.

Goods and Bads: The Complexity of International Trade

The conventional measurement of international trade fails to differentiate between the exchange of beneficial goods and detrimental ones. Trade statistics do not distinguish between the movement of essential drugs and weapons, alcohol, and tobacco. However, it is important to recognize that trade is not neutral in terms of its impact. Some goods are excluded from trade as their exchange is deemed illegal. Notably, illicit drugs, such as heroin and cocaine, are universally recognized as bads rather than goods.

This raises the question of what transforms a good into a bad. Historical events in the Far East shed light on this transformation. In the 1770s, Britain faced a growing trade deficit with China and sought to address it by exporting opium. Initially, opium was smuggled into China, despite its harmful effects on the population. The Chinese authorities strongly opposed this trade, emphasizing the detrimental impact of opium on their society. Nevertheless, British merchants continued to fuel the addiction, leading to conflicts and wars. Over time, the perception of opium shifted, and it became widely recognized as a bad rather than a good.

The Evolution of Tobacco: From Good to Bad

Tobacco has had a devastating impact on public health, causing more deaths in the 20th century than all wars combined. If tobacco were introduced to the market today, it is unlikely that it would receive regulatory approval. Cigarettes, in particular, are designed as a drug delivery system, supplying the highly addictive nicotine to the brain. Many governments have acknowledged the unsatisfactory nature of this situation and have expressed a desire to reduce tobacco consumption. However, the hypocrisy of some governments is evident when they simultaneously promote tobacco while acknowledging its harmful effects. For instance, the United States pressured Thailand not to restrict the import of American cigarettes, despite concerns about increased smoking rates among young men in countries where US companies entered the market.

The 1990s marked a turning point in the perception of tobacco as a good. The World Health Organization successfully enacted the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) in May 2003. This groundbreaking document outlines a range of actions that countries must undertake to control tobacco use, including comprehensive bans on tobacco advertising, prominent health warning labels, and measures to protect non-smokers. The FCTC recognizes tobacco as an internationally traded bad rather than a good. However, challenges remain in ensuring that tobacco control measures are not undermined by international trade agreements.

Addressing the Harmful Impact of Alcohol

Alcohol consumption poses significant health risks and has been linked to a range of detrimental outcomes. For years, countries like Finland and Sweden implemented strict restrictions on alcohol sales, resulting in a reduction in premature deaths. However, these policies faced criticism when the countries joined the European Union, as the alcohol industry argued that they created barriers to trade. The situation worsened when nearby Estonia, with its low alcohol prices, joined the EU, leading to increased consumption and alcohol-related deaths in Finland. Europe’s governments have recognized the need to take action on alcohol, and the European Commission has proposed measures to balance internal market considerations with public health concerns. These proposals aim to protect young people and unborn children, reduce alcohol-related traffic accidents, minimize harm among adults, increase awareness of harmful consumption, and establish a stronger evidence base for future policies.

The Role of Trade and Public Health

The issue of international trade and its impact on public health is complex. While trade can bring economic benefits, it is essential to distinguish between goods and bads to ensure that the negative consequences are mitigated. The historical examples of opium and tobacco demonstrate how goods can transition into bads over time due to their detrimental effects on individuals and society. The international community has taken steps to address these issues, such as the implementation of the FCTC. However, challenges remain, particularly in navigating the intersection of public health and international trade agreements. It is crucial to continue striving for a balance that promotes better health for all while acknowledging the importance of fair and sustainable trade practices.

Conclusion

International trade has proven to be a catalyst for economic growth throughout history. However, it is essential to recognize that not all traded items are goods. Some goods can have detrimental effects on individuals and society, transforming them into bads over time. The historical examples of opium and tobacco demonstrate the evolution of goods into bads due to their harmful impact. The international community has made efforts to address these issues, such as the implementation of the FCTC, which recognizes tobacco as an internationally traded bad. Nevertheless, challenges persist in ensuring that public health concerns are prioritized in the face of international trade agreements. Achieving a balance between trade and public health is crucial to promote better health outcomes for all.

Page 1 of 3